11/19/98 The Town of Front Royal was served with a federal law suit by Civil
Rights Attorney Thomas H. Roberts on behalf of Isaac Thompson, alleging that the town
and his former supervisors, Eugene Tewalt, the former Director of Public Works and
Clarence Deavers, engaged in discrimination based on race in violation of 42
U.S.C. §1981
which makes it unlawful to discriminate by reason of race in the making and enforcement of
contracts, and gives to African American citizens the same right to the full and equal
benefit of all laws as is enjoyed by white citizens. And finally, the plaintiff alleges that the
defendants violated the law of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The suit alleges that Isaac
Thompson has been employed by the town since October of 1986. During this time he was
passed up four times for the position of Motor Equipment Operator 3, a position that was
available, for which he was qualified, and for which he had applied. The suit alleges
Isaac Thompson was passed up for the position because of his race. According to the suit
papers, when the plaintiff complained to Tewalt about not being promoted, Tewalt told him
that Black people always thought that their race entitled them to special treatment. The
suit papers state that Deavers and Tewalt have abused the plaintiff verbally, and Deavers
has abused the plaintiff physically, that Deavers told his crew that he did not want
"this nigger pin," in Thompsons presence. The suit contends that Tewalt
criticized the work of white employees by saying, "This is sloppy work. If this was a
bunch of niggers I would expect this, but yall are white." The suit alleges
that Deavers told the plaintiff, "Im a Klansman and Mr. Tewalt is the head. He
just swore me in for one more year last week. If you really get down to it, yall
shouldve stayed slaves." In the Federal Action, Thompson complains that after
he protested the manner in which he was treated Deavers stated, "What could a man do
if these hands got around his neck?"
Thompson previously filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Commission in
Washington, D.C.
###
The facts and circumstances of each case are unique and
therefore the fact that a law firm has obtained significant verdicts and results
in other cases in no way guarantees that other cases will have similar results.
|