RSS Feed

CPS wrongfully took my child in Virginia. Can I sue CPS?

0

January 3, 2025 by Tom Roberts, Esq.

employer cannot deduct salaried employees for being late

Can I sue Virginia Child Protective Services for wrongfully taking my child from me?

You may be able to sue the person(s) responsible, but probably cannot sue the agency – Child Protective Services.  Sue CPS Worker for removing my child improperly.

 

Child Protective Services is probably not the right party for 2 reasons: (1) CPS is "non sui juris"—that is, they lack the legal capacity to be sued; and (2) under 42 USC § 1983 there is no respondeat superior liability.

(1)  Child Protective Services may not be a proper party to be sued.  As one federal court explained:


The Agencies have moved to dismiss the claims against them on the ground that they are non sui juris—that is, they lack the legal capacity to be sued. See Black’s Law Dictionary 1158 (9th ed. 2009). Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b)(3), “[c]apacity to sue or be sued is determined … by the law of the state where the Court is located.” The Agencies contend that “under Virginia law … agencies of a locality cannot be sued.” Agencies’ Mem. Supp. Mot. Dismiss (“Agencies’ Mot. Dismiss”) (citing Davis v. City of Portsmouth, 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1210 (E.D. Va. 1983), aff’d, 742 F.2d 1448 (4th Cir. 1984) (dismissing Planning Commission of City of Portsmouth because it had “not been given the capacity to be sued by either state or local mandate”)

Mercer v. Fairfax Cnty. Protective Servs., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113019, *7-8

The Court is … unaware of any statute authorizing suit against [CPS]. Accordingly, [CPS does] not have the capacity to be sued and [the] claims against [CPS] will be dismissed with prejudice

Mercer v. Fairfax Cnty. Protective Servs., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113019, *8-9

(2) Absent a pattern or practice, the municipality or county is not a proper defendant as there is no respondeat superior liability under 42 USC § 1983.

Suing the Child Protective Service (CPS) worker!

(1)  Due Process – CPS failed to follow the law: Virginia law authorizes CPS and others to take a child into custody without his parent, guardian, legal custodian or other person standing in loco parentis pending a final hearing on certain circumstances.

§ 63.2-1517. Authority to take child into custody.

A. A physician or child-protective services worker of a local department or law-enforcement official investigating a report or complaint of abuse and neglect may take a child into custody for up to 72 hours without prior approval of parents or guardians provided: 1. The circumstances of the child are such that continuing in his place of residence or in the care or custody of the parent, guardian, custodian or other person responsible for the child’s care, presents an imminent danger to the child’s life or health to the extent that severe or irremediable injury would be likely to result or if evidence of abuse is perishable or subject to deterioration before a hearing can be held; 2. A court order is not immediately obtainable; 3. The court has set up procedures for placing such children; 4. Following taking the child into custody, the parents or guardians are notified as soon as practicable. Every effort shall be made to provide such notice in person; 5. A report is made to the local department; and 6. The court is notified and the person or agency taking custody of such child obtains, as soon as possible, but in no event later than 72 hours, an emergency removal order pursuant to § 16.1-251; however, if a preliminary removal order is issued after a hearing held in accordance with § 16.1-252 within 72 hours of the removal of the child, an emergency removal order shall not be necessary. Any person or agency petitioning for an emergency removal order after four hours have elapsed following taking custody of the child shall state the reasons therefor pursuant to § 16.1-251.
**** So, under those conditions, CPS can remove the child.  But if they fail to get an emergency protective order they must return the child!  Failure to do so may make the CPS worker liable for violation of the 4th Amendment and Due Process, and for state torts of interference with parental rights, for false imprisonment, battery and the like.  Similarly, if they improperly removed the child in the 1st instance without a good faith belief that there was a reasonable basis to do so they may be liable. See Southerland v. City of New York, 652 F.3d 209, 231(2nd Cir. 2011) (“The removal of a child from his or her parent does not violate the parent’s substantive due process rights if a post-removal judicial proceeding is promptly held to confirm that there exists a reasonable basis for the removal”) Shipway v. Jerlinski, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65720, *22-24

But what are the damages?

The plaintiff has the burden to prove damages sufficient for the jury or fact finder to assess them.

If you or the child requires medical treatment or mental health treatment as a result of the wrongful actions of the CPS worker, that is a good place to start on showing damages.  HOWEVER, this often requires expensive expert witnesses at trial.

Are you willing to pay legal fees and costs to vindicate your rights or to seek compensation for the damages?

Litigation is expensive.  Many people assume that since their right was violated they have a right to have an attorney represent them — that is a myth.  If an attorney agrees to take the case on a contingency basis, then you would only be responsible for the costs of the litigation, and the attorney is paid from the proceeds if the case is won.  More often then not however most law firms will not take these cases on a contingency basis — and if you are not willing to pay legal fees, then your rights are not vindicated and you may not be compensated for your damages.

Thomas H Roberts & Associates, PC

105 S 1st St
Richmond, VA 23219
804-783-2000

Call Today!

Disclaimer

The materials are prepared for information purposes only.  The materials are not legal advice.  You should not act upon the information without seeking the advice of an attorney.  Nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship.


0 comments

Sorry, comments are closed.

Search Site

This website provides
hundreds of articles
and commentaries
related to the
law for
informational purposes.
It is not intended
as "legal
advice" to you.

Recent Blogs

Categories

Thomas H. Roberts & Associates, PC